Desktop Computer News
Search    Web    Images    Groups    News »
  Advanced Search
  Preferences    
View Entry
Category: Homepage > Apple

Did Apple make the right choice?

[Archived in Apple, Entry]

[theory.isthereason] With regards to XCode 2.1, the question for me is, since Apple wants developers to program for both architectures — PowerPC and Intel, why even add that option (http://img260.echo.cx/img260/8863/xcodeppcintel9zf.gif) where you have to tick this and that.

Some slightly related from Technorati and Google.

Sauria.com[Sauria.com] Ted Leung on the air: That's the part of the product line that is hurting the worst, and the timeline for Yonah, early 2006 matches the timeframe for Apple to have shipping Intel based hardware. My 1.25GHz Powerbook can't initiate 4 way video iChat, or play Quicktime MPEG-4 without occasional hiccups, and I've never gotten battery life longer than 3 hours (and that's with the display turned all the way down, and all the radios (WiFi and Bluetooth) turned off.

Reflected tags on Technorati: Blog, Amd, Desktop Computer News

Posted at June 24, 2005 04:23 PM

Desktop Computer News

Category: Homepage > Apple

« Previous Apple to switch to Intel CPUs? One reason why.
» Next Computer fixes

Entry: Did Apple make the right choice? (#)

Archived in Apple, Entry


Get Firefox!
Get Thunderbird!


 
Welcome!

PhotoThis is my site about desktop computers. I love plain websites, vital blogs and to relax offline. :-)

Browse Desktop Computers

Browse Brands

Apple
Compaq
HP
IBM
Sony

Browse PCs

AMD Athlon
Pentium III
Pentium 4

Or Shop for Refurbished

Related Products

LCD Monitors
Printers

Browse Price

$400 - $500
$500 - $600
$600 - $700
$700 - $800
$900 - $1000

Shop international
Blogroll for Apple

Credits

Powered by Movable Type

 

Desktop Computer News Homepage  |  All Archives  |  XML RSS | Atom

Desktop Computer News is a service of  acado.com, Dresden, Germany.

Copyright © 2001-2004, acado.com